Understanding ITC vs. EVP

Many paranormal enthusiasts mistakenly interchange Instrumental Trans Communication (ITC) and Electronic Voice Phenomenon (EVP), but they are fundamentally different methods of spirit communication.

What is ITC?

ITC refers to "real-time" communication with spirits using electronic devices.

This includes:

- Spirit Boxes or Ghost Boxes (scanning radio frequencies to generate spoken words)

- Video ITC (capturing spirit images through screens or reflective surfaces)

- Software-based ITC (apps designed for spirit communication)

- Light-based ITC (using lasers or LEDs to detect anomalies)

ITC allows spirits to manifest audibly or visually in real time, making it an interactive experience.

What is EVP?

EVP, on the other hand, is 'an imprint of a disembodied voice' captured on a recording device. Unlike ITC, EVP is:

- Not heard in real time—it is discovered upon playback.

- Not assisted by external devices like radio scanning or apps.

- Often requires noise reduction or amplification for clarity.

EVP is considered a more 'controlled and scientific' method because it eliminates external interference.

Common Misconception: Spirit Boxes & EVP

One of the biggest misconceptions in paranormal research is mistaking Spirit Box recordings for EVP. A true EVP is a voice imprinted onto a recorder without artificial assistance. Spirit Boxes, while useful for ITC, rely on radio frequency sweeps, which can introduce false positives.

The confusion between ITC and EVP has a significant impact on paranormal research, affecting credibility, methodology, and public perception. Here’s how:

1. Credibility Issues

When investigators mislabel Spirit Box recordings as EVP, it undermines the integrity of paranormal research. EVP is considered a more controlled phenomenon because it does not rely on external radio frequencies. Misidentifying ITC as EVP can lead skeptics to dismiss legitimate findings.

2. Misinterpretation of Data

Since ITC involves real-time communication, responses can be influenced by external noise or radio interference. EVP, on the other hand, is an imprint that is discovered upon playback. Confusing the two leads to flawed analysis, making it harder to distinguish genuine paranormal voices from false positives.

3. Skepticism & Scientific Acceptance

Paranormal research already faces skepticism. When investigators fail to differentiate between ITC and EVP, it reinforces doubts about the validity of their findings. Scientific communities demand repeatable and controlled experiments, and EVP is often seen as more reliable due to its structured methodology.

4. Ethical Concerns

Some researchers intentionally blur the lines between ITC and EVP to make their findings seem more compelling. This can mislead audiences and damage trust within the paranormal community. Clear distinctions help maintain ethical standards and ensure honest reporting.

5. Impact on Investigative Techniques

Paranormal teams that do not differentiate between ITC and EVP may use inappropriate methods for their investigations. For example, relying on Spirit Boxes for EVP research can introduce bias and contamination, making it harder to validate results.

How EVP Works

EVP recordings typically occur when investigators use audio recorders in a quiet environment, asking questions and later reviewing the playback. The voices captured can range from whispers to full sentences, often responding to questions or making cryptic statements.

Characteristics of EVP

• Not heard during recording—only discovered upon playback.

• Can be faint or distorted, requiring amplification or filtering.

• Often brief, typically a word or short phrase.

• May respond to questions, suggesting intelligent interaction.

• Can be in different languages or even a mix of languages (polyglot EVPs).
  

Possible Explanations

EVP is widely debated, with theories ranging from paranormal origins to psychological and technical explanations:

• Paranormal Theory: EVP is believed to be voices of spirits attempting to communicate.

• Auditory Pareidolia: The brain interprets random sounds as speech.

• Radio Interference: Stray radio signals may be unintentionally recorded.

• Equipment Artifacts: Background noise, clothing rustling or static can create false positives.
  

History of EVP

EVP research dates back to the 1940s, with early experiments by Attila von Szalay, who attempted to record spirit voices. The phenomenon gained popularity in the 1970s, thanks to Konstantīns Raudive, who documented thousands of EVP recordings.

EVP vs. ITC

Unlike Instrumental Trans Communication (ITC), which involves real-time spirit interaction through devices like Spirit Boxes, EVP is passive it is an imprint discovered after recording. This distinction is crucial in paranormal research.

There have been several notable EVP recordings that have intrigued paranormal researchers and skeptics alike. Here are a few chilling examples:

1. The “Don’t Go in the Basement” EVP

During a 2011 investigation at The Cafe Sport in Swinton, Greater Manchester, paranormal researchers recorded an EVP that seemed to warn them not to enter the basement. The eerie part? The group’s skeptic, who was standing next to the recorder, did not hear anything at the time of recording.

2. The Suicide Bridge EVP

Pasadena, California’s Colorado Street Bridge, also known as Suicide Bridge, has been the site of numerous tragic deaths. Paranormal investigators recorded an EVP that sounded like a demonic voice, adding to the bridge’s haunted reputation.

3. The Haunted Doll EVP

A doll named Carol Anne is believed to be haunted, and paranormal investigators have captured EVPs of her speaking. Some recordings include whispers and responses to direct questions, making her one of the most famous haunted dolls.

4. The Central New York Ghost Hunters EVP

In 2007, the Central New York Ghost Hunters investigated an old hotel and captured one of the most terrifying EVPs ever recorded. The audio contained sounds of a struggle, a male voice asking for help, and even the ticking of a clock—despite there being no clock in the hotel.

5. Konstantin Raudive’s EVP Experiments

In the 1960s, Latvian parapsychologist Konstantin Raudive conducted EVP experiments and claimed to have recorded voices of historical figures, including Hitler and Stalin. His work helped popularize EVP research

Scientists generally approach Electronic Voice Phenomenon (EVP) with skepticism, viewing it as a product of psychological and technical factors rather than paranormal activity.

Here are some key perspectives:

1. Auditory Pareidolia

Many scientists argue that EVP is a form of auditory pareidolia, where the brain interprets random sounds as recognizable speech. This phenomenon is similar to seeing faces in clouds—our brains naturally seek patterns in noise.

2. Equipment Artifacts

Recording devices can pick up radio interference, static, or background noise, which may be misinterpreted as voices. Some EVP recordings contain distorted sounds that, when amplified or filtered, seem to form words.

3. Psychological Influence

Studies suggest that expectation bias plays a role in EVP interpretation. If a person is told what a recording says, they are more likely to hear that phrase. This is why controlled experiments often require blind testing.

4. Controlled Experiments

Some researchers have conducted controlled EVP experiments, eliminating external noise and interference. While a few studies report unexplained voices, mainstream science remains unconvinced due to the lack of repeatable, verifiable results.

5. Skepticism in Academia

EVP is widely regarded as pseudoscience in academic circles. While paranormal investigators continue to study it, scientists emphasize the need for rigorous methodologies to rule out natural explanations

GUIDE TO CONDUCTING AN EVP SESSION Conducting EVP (Electronic Voice Phenomenon) recordings safely requires careful preparation, controlled environments, and ethical considerations. Here’s a step-by-step guide to ensure a safe and effective EVP session:

1. Choose the Right Equipment

• Use a high-quality digital recorder that captures uncompressed audio (PCM or WAV format).

• Avoid using smartphones, as they may introduce interference.

• Consider external microphones for better sound clarity.

• Use noise-canceling headphones to analyze recordings more effectively.

2. Select a Quiet Location

• Choose a location with minimal background noise (no traffic, electronics, or chatter).

• Turn off radios, TVs, and other devices that could create false positives.

• If outdoors, avoid windy areas or places with excessive ambient noise.

3. Set Up Your Recording Session

• Place the recorder on a stable surface to prevent movement noise.

• Start by announcing the date, time, and location into the recorder.

• If working with a team, ensure everyone remains still and silent during the session.

4. Ask Clear Questions

• Speak clearly and slowly, leaving 10-15 seconds of silence between questions.

• Avoid leading questions (e.g., “Are you a ghost?”) and instead ask open-ended ones (e.g., “Can you tell us your name?”).

• If any team member makes a noise, they should immediately acknowledge it to prevent misinterpretation.

5. Review Your Recording Carefully

• Listen to the recording using headphones in a quiet space.

• Use audio software to enhance faint sounds but avoid excessive filtering.

• If you hear something unusual, compare it to background noise to rule out interference.

6. Ethical Considerations

• Always respect the location and any spirits you may be communicating with.

• Do not provoke or challenge entities aggressively.

• If you feel uncomfortable or experience unusual activity, end the session immediately.

7. Keep a Log of Your Findings

• Document the time, location, and conditions of each EVP session.

• Note any unexplained sounds and compare them across multiple recordings.

• Share findings responsibly, avoiding exaggerated claims.

Famous ITC Sessions:

Bridging the Gap Between Real-Time Spirit Communication and Paranormal Research

ITC (Instrumental Trans Communication) has produced some of the most compelling spirit communication cases, shaping paranormal investigations worldwide. Below are some of the most notable ITC sessions, demonstrating how spirits may interact with electronic devices.

1. The Scole Experiment (1993-1998)

One of the most famous ITC experiments took place in Scole, England, where researchers claimed to have received messages, images, and even physical objects from spirits. Using spirit boxes, video ITC, and light-based communication, the experiment was extensively documented and remains a landmark case in ITC history.

2. The Spiricom Device (1980s)

Invented by George Meek and used by William O’Neil, the Spiricom was designed to facilitate two-way communication between spirits and the living. O’Neil claimed to have had direct conversations with a deceased scientist, Dr. George Mueller, who allegedly provided technical advice for improving the device. Though controversial, Spiricom is regarded as an important milestone in ITC research.

3. Marcello Bacci’s Radio ITC Sessions

Italian researcher Marcello Bacci conducted ITC sessions using old vacuum tube radios, capturing real-time spirit voices. Witnesses claimed to hear direct responses to questions, adding credibility to his experiments. His work remains widely discussed among ITC researchers.

4. The Luxembourg ITC Experiments

In the 1980s, paranormal investigators Jules and Maggie Harsch-Fischbach conducted ITC experiments in Luxembourg, using television screens and audio devices. They reportedly received spirit images and voices, including messages from deceased loved ones. Their research helped demonstrate how ITC differs from EVP, emphasizing interactive communication methods.

5. Friedrich Jürgenson’s Accidental Discovery

Swedish filmmaker Friedrich Jürgenson unknowingly recorded spirit voices while documenting bird sounds in the 1950s. His unexpected findings led him to explore EVP and ITC, becoming one of the pioneers of paranormal voice recordings. His work laid the foundation for future research in the field.

A 2022 Livestream using an ITC device (Spirit Box) to invite contact from Melissa Caddick

A mysterious apparition takes shape in swirling smoke during a 2012 spirit communication session.

ITC - Employing alternative techniques for Spirit manifestation

Similar to the image from 2012, this method involved using smoke to invite a Spirit to reveal themselves. The spirit appeared in the rising smoke of an incense stick. Observe the distinct detail of the facial features. Such undeniable clarity confirms the dismissal of pareidolia.

Other methods of ITC can consist of water, wax, steam and fire.

hope this helps explain the difference between the two better. Keep it real and enjoy the interactions with the other side, but always respect their choice whether or not to come through, if they do wonderful! If they don't, don't get disheartened, sometimes contact takes time.

Stay blessed Karen

TheHighPriestessStudio.com #ITC #EVP #SpiritCommunication #Paranormal #DidYouKnow